SHIT EVIDENCE

An accused burglar has been found not guilty despite his dirty underwear being found at the scene of the crime:

In her judgment, Chief Justice Helen Murrell said she could not discount the possibility that someone else had been wearing Mr King’s dirty underpants.

“I am not satisfied that guilt is the only available rational inference,” she wrote.

“There is, for example, a reasonable [albeit small] possibility that the burglar was someone else who was wearing unwashed underpants that had previously been worn by the accused.”

Shit finding.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s