American gun control advocates should consider the consequences of Brazil’s efforts to disarm law-abiding citizens:

In the world’s most murderous country, gun control is starting to lose its appeal.

Desperate Brazilians are wondering whether they’d be better off armed, given that around 60,000 of their compatriots are killed each year. Polls show support for gun ownership gaining ground. In an election year, politicians are paying attention.
One of the candidates leading the field for October’s 2018 presidential election — hardline conservative Jair Bolsonaro — has promised to allow law-abiding citizens to arm themselves, a popular pledge in the nation with by far the most homicides of the entire world. Even before then, Congress may debate legislation to overturn the “disarmament statute,” a law that severely restricts civilian ownership of guns, and virtually bans their carry. The proposal would allow Brazilians with clean criminal records who pass psychological and firearm exams to buy up to six weapons and to carry them.
“Everyday, everywhere you look, the criminal is armed with a high-powered weapon as the citizen tries to hide,” Rogerio Peninha Mendonca, the lawmaker behind the proposal, said in an interview. “What we want is for the citizen to be more capable of defending himself.”
 The idea runs counter to recent calls in the U.S. for greater gun control, as well as the global trend towards restricting access to firearms that’s seen Australia, the U.K, Canada, New Zealand and Germany tighten their laws in recent decades.
Conservative presidential candidate Jair Bolsonaro, a former army officer, notes:
“Dictatorships only take root after disarmament programs.”
The Second Amendment allows the law abiding to arm themselves so as protect against predation by both criminals and oppressive government.


  1. It’s about time that we law abiding taxpayers were allowed some capacity to resist thugs without being charged with assault just for defending ourselves in our homes and vehicles. I am sick of hearing pitiful platitudes when people are robbed such as ‘It’s only your jewelry [or car, or money, or your house trashed, etc.]” as though one’s private possessions are fully replaceable and had no real value. My possessions are of value to me over and above any monetary value. They are mine. As things stand criminals often carry weapons and/or operate as/in gangs [social ‘groups’ in Victoria], but if we have an old axe handle in the car just for defence we are guilty. The balance needs to change, but the Leftist pity professionals will always excuse and explain-away the anti-social and criminal behaviour of their client base upon whom they depend for employment.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s